Writing

by Tommy

I was going to start off this post by saying how much I loved it, but that’d be kind of redundant, wouldn’t it? I mean, you’re reading this, aren’t you? If I didn’t then I’ve wasted a lot of my time writing this blog, haven’t I?

It would seem like the natural step forward, then, to want to write a novel. I could never do that though. I look at some of the books I read and marvel about how much detail goes into every single book, and it overwhelms me. I can manage basic plots but the depth at which some authors bring to their characters is, being honest, a little scary. I was never able to describe any of my characters past their superficial hopes, dreams and failings.

That’s why, I think, I went for blogging: I can write about a given subject one day, and once I finish talking about it – I leave it go and the next time I come back to write, I can think about something completely different, which is nice. My attention span for these sorts of things is a little bit lackluster, so this ‘love and leave’ blog thing I’ve got going really does suit me down to the ground.

1206626_22752384

One of my (many) aspirations in life, however, is to write a book. I think that a book is a wonderful imprint of the author, even if it’s fiction. Especially if it’s fiction, in fact. When I read a book, I want to be told a story. Good storytelling is hard to come by these days. Books, I believe, should be as easy as films to follow. Any less than that and I just get restless.

Does that mean that films that are based on books (for example: Harry Potter, Twilight, Lord of the Rings) should simply be the book on screen? No. Take the Harry Potter movies for example. I think I speak for the majority of people when I say that the Potter movies got better as they went on (disclaimer; I haven’t seen the 6th one) – but that was because the first and second were very true to the book- at the expense that they were only average movies. I think the new directors have realized this, and the later movies have steered away from the books, but are better stand-alone movies because of it. The best description of the later movies comes from my cousin:

“They’re grand movies if you don’t compare them to the books. They stand alone fine”

What do we think? Bear in mind I’m using Harry Potter only as an example.